Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
Iran May Run Centrifuges in Bunker     03/27 06:07

   The United States is considering letting Tehran run hundreds of centrifuges 
at a once-secret, fortified underground bunker in exchange for limits on 
centrifuge work and research and development at other sites, officials have 
told The Associated Press.

   LAUSANNE, Switzerland (AP) -- The United States is considering letting 
Tehran run hundreds of centrifuges at a once-secret, fortified underground 
bunker in exchange for limits on centrifuge work and research and development 
at other sites, officials have told The Associated Press.

   The trade-off would allow Iran to run several hundred of the devices at its 
Fordo facility, although the Iranians would not be allowed to do work that 
could lead to an atomic bomb and the site would be subject to international 
inspections, according to Western officials familiar with details of 
negotiations now underway. In return, Iran would be required to scale back the 
number of centrifuges it runs at its Natanz facility and accept other 
restrictions on nuclear-related work.

   Instead of uranium, which can be enriched to be the fissile core of a 
nuclear weapon, any centrifuges permitted at Fordo would be fed elements such 
as zinc, xenon or germanium for separating out isotopes used in medicine, 
industry or science, the officials said. The number of centrifuges would not be 
enough to produce the amount of uranium needed to produce a weapon within a 
year --- the minimum time-frame that Washington and its negotiating partners 

   The officials spoke only on condition of anonymity because they were not 
authorized to discuss details of the sensitive negotiations as the latest round 
of talks began Friday between U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Iranian 
Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif and their teams. The negotiators are 
racing to meet an end-of-March deadline to reach an outline of an agreement 
that would grant Iran relief from international sanctions in exchange for 
curbing its nuclear program. The deadline for a final agreement is June 30.

   One senior U.S. official declined to comment on the specific proposal but 
said the goal since the beginning of the talks has been "to have Fordo 
converted so it's not being used to enrich uranium." That official would not 
say more.

   The officials stressed that the potential compromise on Fordo is just one of 
several options on a menu of highly technical equations being discussed in the 
talks. All of the options are designed to keep Iran at least a year away from 
producing an atomic weapon for the life of the agreement, which will run for at 
least 10 years. U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz has joined the last several 
rounds as the negotiations have gotten more technical.

   Experts say the compromise for Fordo could still be problematic. They note 
it would allow Iran to keep intact technology that could be quickly repurposed 
for uranium enrichment at a sensitive facility that the U.S. and its allies 
originally wanted stripped of all such machines --- centrifuges that can spin 
uranium gas into uses ranging from reactor fuel to weapons-grade material.

   And the issue of inspector access and verification is key. Iran has resisted 
"snap inspections" in the past. Even as the nuclear talks have made progress, 
Iran has yet to satisfy questions about its past possible nuclear-related 
military activity. The fact that questions about such activity, known as 
Possible Military Dimensions, or PMDs, remain unresolved is a serious concern 
for the U.N. atomic watchdog.

   In addition, the site at Fordo is a particular concern because it is 
hardened and dug deeply into a mountainside making it resistant --- possibly 
impervious --- to air attack. Such an attack is an option that neither Israel 
nor the U.S. has ruled out in case the talks fail.

   And while too few to be used for proliferation by themselves, even a few 
hundred extra centrifuges at Fordo would be a concern when looked at in the 
context of total numbers.

   Robert Menendez, senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, 
said such a compromise demonstrates that the U.S. is negotiating "any deal for 
a deal's sake."

   "An undue amount of trust and faith is being placed in a negotiating partner 
that has spent decades deceiving the international community," denying 
inspectors access and actively destabilizing the region, he said.

   As negotiations stand, the number of centrifuges would grow to more than 
6,000, when the other site is included. Olli Heinonen, who was in charge of the 
Iran nuclear file as a deputy director general of the U.N's International 
Atomic Energy Agency until 2010, says even 6,000 operating centrifuges would be 
"a big number."

   Asked of the significance of hundreds more at Fordo, he said, "Every machine 

   Iran reported the site to the IAEA six years ago in what Washington says was 
an attempt to pre-empt President Barack Obama and the prime ministers of 
Britain and France going public with its existence a few days later. Tehran 
later used the site to enrich uranium to a level just a technical step away 
from weapons-grade until late 2013, when it froze its nuclear program under a 
temporary arrangement that remains in effect as the sides negotiate.

   Twice extended, the negotiations have turned into a U.S.-Iran tug-of-war 
over how many of the machines Iran would be allowed to operate since the talks 
resumed over two years ago. Tehran denies nuclear weapons ambitions, saying it 
wants to enrich only for energy, scientific and medical purposes.

   Washington has taken the main negotiating role with Tehran in talks that 
formally remain between Iran and six world powers, and officials told the AP at 
last week's round that the two sides were zeroing in on a cap of 6,000 
centrifuges at Natanz, Iran's main enrichment site.

   That's fewer than the nearly 10,000 Tehran now runs at Natanz, yet 
substantially more than the 500 to 1,500 that Washington originally wanted as a 
ceiling. Only a year ago, U.S. officials floated 4,000 as a possible compromise.

   One of the officials said discussions focus on an extra 480 centrifuges at 
Fordo. That would potentially bring the total number of machines to close to 

   David Albright of Washington's Institute for Security and International 
Security says a few hundred centrifuges operated by the Iranians would not be a 
huge threat --- if they were anywhere else but the sensitive Fordo site.

   Beyond its symbolic significance, "it keeps the infrastructure in place and 
keeps a leg up, if they want to restart (uranium) enrichment operations," said 
Albright, who is a go-to person on the Iran nuclear issue for the U.S. 


Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN