Printable Page Headline News   Return to Menu - Page 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 13
Congress Look to Update Education Law  07/07 06:15

   Members of CongressIt's something most Democrats and Republicans in Congress 
can agree on -- an update to the Bush-era No Child Left Behind education law is 
much needed and long overdue.

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- It's something most Democrats and Republicans in Congress 
can agree on --- an update to the Bush-era No Child Left Behind education law 
is much needed and long overdue.

   This week, the Senate and House take up rewrites of the 2002 law, with 
lawmakers seeking to finally resolve a key question they have struggled with 
for years: how much of a role should the federal government have in ensuring a 
quality education and boosting achievement for children, poor and affluent 
alike. Getting enough support to send a bill to President Barack Obama that 
he'll sign also may be no easy task.

   Even before the floor debate began in the Senate, the White House weighed in 
late Monday --- saying the Obama administration can't support either the 
Republican-drafted bill in the House or the bipartisan measure in the Senate. 
The Senate was scheduled to take up its version Tuesday, the House on Wednesday.

   The Senate bill is sponsored by Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, the Republican 
chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, and 
the panel's senior Democrat, Washington's Patty Murray. It passed the committee 
unanimously in April. No small feat, agree Alexander, a former U.S. education 
secretary, and Murray, a former preschool teacher --- who had to win over 
conservatives on the panel like GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky as well as more 
liberal members, such as Massachusetts Democrat Sen. Elizabeth Warren.

   The measure would keep the reading and math tests mandated in No Child Left 
Behind --- but in a significant move, shift to the states, and away from 
Washington, decisions about how to use those tests to measure school and 
teacher performance. It also would expressly prohibit the federal government 
from requiring or encouraging any specific set of academic standards. That's a 
reference to the Common Core standards, which were drafted by the states with 
the support of the administration but have become a rallying point for those 
who want to see a reduced federal role in education.

   "I have always wanted us to have high national goals and high standards," 
Alexander said in an interview. "But in our country, I believe you have to do 
that state by state, and community by community ... you just can't impose it 
from Washington D.C. You might get short-term results, but you're going to get 
a long-term backlash."

   Murray, ahead of the Senate debate, said the bipartisan bill is an attempt 
to fix a law that isn't working. "I'm looking forward to working to improve and 
strengthen this bill throughout the process and I will be focused on ensuring 
all kids, especially traditionally underserved students, can learn, grow, and 
thrive in the classroom," she said.

   Republicans are expected to press for more flexibility for the states.

   The Obama administration said Monday that both the House and Senate bills 
lack the strong accountability provisions that it is seeking.

   "The Senate bill is missing key pieces and we cannot support it as it 
currently stands," Education Secretary Arne Duncan told reporters. As for the 
House bill, he said the legislation was "a major step backwards for our nation 
and its children" and appealed to Republicans to strike a more bipartisan chord.

   Emphasizing the need for Congress to come up with a bill acceptable to the 
White House, Duncan and Cecilia Munoz, director of the White House Domestic 
Policy Council, released a report citing sizable achievement gaps between 
students in the lowest-performing 5 percent of schools and those in all other 
schools --- a 31-percentage point gap in reading and 36-percentage point gap in 

   Munoz said any education bill must deal not only with identifying those 
struggling schools but also require that states and schools have a plan to 
close the gap.

   The House bill is sponsored by Rep. John Kline, a Minnesota Republican who 
chairs the House Education and the Workforce Committee. The legislation gives 
the states more control over accountability and includes a school choice 
provision that would allow public money to follow low-income children to 
different public schools --- something Democrats don't support.

   The House abruptly canceled a vote on the Kline bill in February when it 
became clear that it didn't have enough support from conservatives to pass. The 
White House has said Obama would veto it.

   Seeking to close significant gaps in the achievement of poor and minority 
students and their more affluent peers, No Child Left Behind mandated annual 
testing in reading and math for students in grades three to eight and again in 
high school. Schools had to show student growth or face consequences. But 
critics complained the law was rigid, overly ambitious and punitive, and there 
was too much testing.

   Anticipating that No Child's goal that all students should be able to read 
and do math at grade level by 2014 could not be met, the Obama administration 
has been granting states waivers around some of the law's more stringent 
requirements. In return, schools agreed to certain conditions, like using 
college- and career-ready standards such as Common Core. The administration has 
granted waivers to 42 states, Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia.


Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN